Intraoperative microneurography in patients with classic trigeminal neuralgia
https://doi.org/10.64265/3033-649X-2026.2.2.41-51
Abstract
The aim. To present the fi rst results of intraoperative microneurography of the trigeminal root in patients with classic trigeminal neuralgia and to assess the relationship between recorded electrical activity and pain regression or persistence after microvascular decompression.
Materials and methods. The study included 13 patients with classic trigeminal neuralgia who underwent microvascular decompression (MVD) and 4 patients with posterior cranial fossa tumors (control group). Patients were divided into three groups: Group 1 – MVD with tactile stimulation (n = 9); Group 2 – MVD without stimulation (n = 4); Group 3 – control group with tactile stimulation (n = 4). Electrical activity of the nerve root was recorded before and after decompression. Pain assessment was performed using the Visual Analog Scale and the BNI scale.
Results. In all patients of Group 1, deep tactile stimulation evoked electrical activity of the trigeminal root before surgery, whereas superfi cial stimulation was not accompanied by recordable activity. After MVD, a signifi cant reduction in electrical activity was observed in 67 % of cases (6 out of 9), which correlated with pain regression. In three patients with persistent pain (Group 1), electrical activity was also recorded after surgery. In Group 2, no spontaneous ectopic activity was detected. In the control group, no electrical activity characteristic of classic trigeminal neuralgia was found. The signal-to-background amplitude ratio in patients with persistent pain after surgery was signifi cantly greater than 1 compared to the pain regression group (p = 0.003).
Conclusion. Intraoperative microneurography allows the detection of pathological electrical activity of the trigeminal root in patients with classic trigeminal neuralgia, which correlates with the presence of pain and its regression after surgical intervention. The proposed parameter – the ratio of electrical activity amplitude to background – may be considered a potential criterion for the eff ectiveness of decompression, but requires further study in an expanded cohort.
About the Authors
E. A. LekhnovRussian Federation
Evgeniy A. Lekhnov – Cand. Sci. (Med.); Teaching Assistant at the Department of Neurosurgery
Krasny ave., 52, Novosibirsk, 630091
Nemirovicha-Danchenko str., 132/1, Novosibirsk, 630087
A. F. Alziralkhuseyni
Russian Federation
Abedallah F. Alziralkhuseyni – Post-graduate Researcher at the Department of Neurosurgery
Krasny ave., 52, Novosibirsk, 630091
K. V. Slavin
United States
Konstantin V. Slavin – Professor, Head of the Department of Stereotaxic and Functiounal Neurosurgery
West Harrison str., 1200, Chicago, Illinois, 60607
References
1. Cruccu G, Finnerup NB, Jensen TS, Scholz J, Sindou M, Svensson P, et al. Trigeminal neuralgia: New classification and diagnostic grading for practice and research. Neurology. 2016; 87(2): 220-228. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002840
2. Kim M, Kim H. A review of recent evidence on trigeminal neuralgia. J Oral Med Pain. 2023; (48): 3-10. https://doi.org/10.14476/jomp.2023.48.1.3
3. Gupta N. Trigeminal neuralgia. Prabhakar H, Ali Z (eds). Textbook of Neuroanesthesia and Neurocritical Care. Singapore: Springer; 2019: 457-479.
4. Bindra A. Etiopathogenesis of trigeminal neuralgia. Rath G (ed.). Handbook of Trigeminal Neuralgia. Singapore: Springer; 2019: 23-29.
5. Burchiel KJ. Neurovascular compression and trigeminal neuralgia. APS J. 1993; 2(4): 234-236.
6. Grigoryan YuA, Istomin AA. Structural changes in the trigeminal nerve root in trigeminal neuralgia. Problems of Neurodentistry and Dentistry. 1999; (3): 31-36. (In Russ.).
7. Dash’jan VG, Nikitin AS. Neurovascular conflicts of the posterior cranial fossa. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2017; 117(2): 155-162. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro201711721155-162
8. Kerr FW. Pathology of trigeminal neuralgia: Light and electron microscopic observations. J Neurosurg. 1967; 26(1 Suppl): 151-156. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1967.26.1part2.0151
9. Schwab SI. III. The pathology of trigeminal neuralgia, illustrated by the microscopic examination of two gasserian ganglia. Ann Surg. 1901; 33(6): 696-708. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-190101000-00065
10. Magerl W, Treede RD. Secondary tactile hypoesthesia: A novel type of pain-induced somatosensory plasticity in human subjects. Neurosci Lett. 2004; 361(1-3): 136-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2003.12.001
11. Siqueira SR, Alves B, Malpartida HM, Teixeira MJ, Siqueira JT. Abnormal expression of voltage-gated sodium channels Nav1.7, Nav1.3 and Nav1.8 in trigeminal neuralgia. Neuroscience. 2009; 164(2): 573-577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.08.037
12. Xu W, Zhang J, Wang Y, Wang L, Wang X. Changes in the expression of voltage-gated sodium channels Nav1.3, Nav1.7, Nav1.8, and Nav1.9 in rat trigeminal ganglia following chronic constriction injury. Neuroreport. 2016; 27(12): 929-934. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0000000000000632
13. Rasminsky M. Ectopic impulse generation in pathological nerve fibres. Trends Neurosci. 1983; 6: 388-390. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-2236(83)90172-8
14. Smith KJ, Felts PA, Kapoor R. Review: Axonal hyperexcitability: Mechanisms and role in symptom production in demyelinating diseases. Neurosci. 1997; 3(4): 237-246.
15. Obermann M, Yoon MS, Ese D, Maschke M, Kaube H, Diener HC, et al. Impaired trigeminal nociceptive processing in patients with trigeminal neuralgia. Neurology. 2007; 69(9): 835-841. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000269670.30045.6b
16. Bendtsen L, Zakrzewska JM, Heinskou TB, Hodaie M, Leal PRL, Nurmikko T, et al. Advances in diagnosis, classification, pathophysiology, and management of trigeminal neuralgia. Lancet Neurol. 2020; 19(9): 784-796. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30233-7
17. Cruccu G, Di Stefano G, Truini A. Trigeminal neuralgia. N Engl J Med. 2020; 383(8): 754-762. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1914484
18. Lambru G, Zakrzewska J, Matharu M. Trigeminal neuralgia: A practical guide. Pract Neurol. 2021; 21(5): 392-402. https://doi.org/10.1136/practneurol-2020-002782
19. Bendtsen L, Zakrzewska JM, Abbott J, Braschinsky M, Di Stefano G, Donnet A, et al. European Academy of Neurology guideline on trigeminal neuralgia. Eur J Neurol. 2019; 26(6): 831-849. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.13950
20. Tai AX, Nayar VV. Update on trigeminal neuralgia. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2019; 21(9): 42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-019-0583-0
21. Yadav YR, Nishtha Y, Sonjjay P, Vijay P, Shailendra R, Yatin K. Trigeminal neuralgia. Asian J Neurosurg. 2017; 12(4): 585-597. https://doi.org/10.4103/ajns.AJNS_67_14
22. Xu R, Xie ME, Jackson CM. Trigeminal neuralgia: Current approaches and emerging interventions. J Pain Res. 2021; 14: 3437-3463. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S331036
23. Sindou M, Leston J, Decullier E, Chapuis F. Microvascular decompression for primary trigeminal neuralgia: Long-term effectiveness and prognostic factors in a series of 362 consecutive patients with clear-cut neurovascular conflicts who underwent pure decompression. J Neurosurg. 2007; 107(6): 1144-1153. https://doi.org/10.3171/JNS-07/12/1144
24. Vallbo ÅB. Microneurography: How it started and how it works. J Neurophysiol. 2018; 120(3): 1415-1427. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00933.2017
25. Johansson RS, Trulsson M, Olsson KA, Westberg KG. Mechanoreceptor activity from the human face and oral mucosa. Exp Brain Res. 1988; 72(1): 204-208. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00248518
26. Nordin M, Hagbarth KE. Mechanoreceptive units in the human infra-orbital nerve. Acta Physiol Scand. 1989; 135(2): 149-161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-1716.1989.tb08562.x
27. Trulsson M, Johansson RS, Olsson KA. Directional sensitivity of human periodontal mechanoreceptive afferents to forces applied to the teeth. J Physiol. 1992; 447: 373-389. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1992.sp019007
28. Trulsson M, Essick GK. Low-threshold mechanoreceptive afferents in the human lingual nerve. J Neurophysiol. 1997; 77(2): 737-748. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1997.77.2.737
29. Burchiel KJ. Abnormal impulse generation in focally demyelinated trigeminal roots. J Neurosurg. 1980; 53(5): 674-683. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1980.53.5.0674
30. Burchiel KJ. Ectopic impulse generation in focally demyelinated trigeminal nerve. Exp Neurol. 1980; 69(2): 423-429. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4886(80)90225-3
31. Stechison MT, Møller A, Lovely TJ. Intraoperative mapping of the trigeminal nerve root: Technique and application in the surgical management of facial pain. Neurosurgery. 1996; 38(1): 76-81; discussion 81-82. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-199601000-00018
32. Rogers CL, Shetter AG, Fiedler JA, Smith KA, Han PP, Speiser BL. Gamma knife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia: The initial experience of The Barrow Neurological Institute. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000; 47(4): 1013-1019. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-3016(00)00513-7
33. Sindou M, Howeidy T, Acevedo G. Anatomical observations during microvascular decompression for idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia (with correlations between topography of pain and site of the neurovascular conflict). Prospective study in a series of 579 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2002; 144(1): 1-12; discussion 12-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s701-002-8269-4
34. Baumann TK, Burchiel KJ. A method for intraoperative microneurographic recording of unitary activity in the trigeminal ganglion of patients with trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosci Methods. 2004; 132(1): 19-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.08.016
35. Burchiel KJ, Baumann TK. Pathophysiology of trigeminal neuralgia: New evidence from a trigeminal ganglion intraoperative microneurographic recording. Case report. J Neurosurg. 2004; 101(5): 872-873. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2004.101.5.0872
36. Renehan WE, Klein BG, Chiaia NL, Jacquin MF, Rhoades RW. Physiological and anatomical consequences of infraorbital nerve transection in the trigeminal ganglion and trigeminal spinal tract of the adult rat. J Neurosci. 1989; 9(2): 548-557. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.09-02-00548.1989
37. Burchiel KJ. Carbamazepine inhibits spontaneous activity in experimental neuromas. Exp Neurol. 1988; 102(2): 249-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4886(88)90101-x
38. Chudler EH, Anderson LC, Byers MR. Trigeminal ganglion neuronal activity and glial fi brillary acidic protein immunoreactivity after inferior alveolar nerve crush in the adult rat. Pain. 1997; 73(2): 141-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(97)00088-2
39. Devor M, Amir R, Rappaport ZH. Pathophysiology of trigeminal neuralgia: The ignition hypothesis. Clin J Pain. 2002; 18(1): 4-13. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002508-200201000-00002
40. Kumagami H. Neruopathological findings of hemifacial spasm and trigeminal neuralgia. Arch Otolaryngol. 1974; 99(3): 160-164. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1974.00780030168002
41. Fried K, Bongenhielm U, Boissonade FM, Robinson PP. Nerve injury-induced pain in the trigeminal system. Neuroscientist. 2001; 7(2): 155-165. https://doi.org/10.1177/107385840100700210
42. Anderson LS, Black RG, Abraham J, Ward AA Jr. Neuronal hyperactivity in experimental trigeminal deafferentation. J Neurosurg. 1971; 35(4): 444-52. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1971.35.4.0444
43. Amir R, Michaelis M, Devor M. Burst discharge in primary sensory neurons: Triggered by subthreshold oscillations, maintained by depolarizing afterpotentials. J Neurosci. 2002; 22(3): 1187-1198. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-03-01187.2002
44. Rappaport HZ, Devor M. Trigeminal neuralgia: The role of self-sustaining discharge in the trigeminal ganglion. Pain. 1994; 56(2): 127-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(94)90086-8
Review
For citations:
Lekhnov E.A., Alziralkhuseyni A.F., Slavin K.V. Intraoperative microneurography in patients with classic trigeminal neuralgia. Sibneuro. 2026;2(2):41-51. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.64265/3033-649X-2026.2.2.41-51
JATS XML
