The international consensus protocol for the management of severe traumatic brain injury in the absence of intracranial pressure monitoring

Background. Severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains one of the leading causes of mortality and disability, particularly in resource-limited settings where invasive intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring is unavailable. The international Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines require specialized equipment, creating a substantial gap between evidence-based medicine and actual clinical practice in low-resource institutions.

The aim. To present and analyze the international consensus protocol CREVICE (Consensus REVised ICE (Imaging and Clinical Examination)) – a modified management system for patients with severe TBI designed for use in the absence of ICP monitoring – and to evaluate its potential applicability in Russian healthcare facilities.

Main provisions. The CREVICE protocol is a logical development of the ICE protocol, which was validated in the randomized BEST:TRIP trial. The protocol is based on the use of computed tomography (modified Marshall classification) and clinical-neurological criteria (motor response on the Glasgow Coma Scale, pupillary response) as surrogate markers of intracranial hypertension. The protocol includes clear criteria for initiating treatment of suspected intracranial hypertension, a hierarchical escalation therapy with dosing of hyperosmolar agents, an algorithm for managing neurological deterioration, and a detailed de-escalation system using visual decision-making matrices. Contraindicated therapeutic modalities (corticosteroids, prolonged hyperventilation, continuous mannitol infusion) are specifically addressed.

Conclusion. The CREVICE protocol is a practical tool that enables the application of modern neurocritical care principles in the absence of invasive neuromonitoring. Its implementation into clinical practice may contribute to treatment standardization, reduced mortality, and improved functional outcomes in patients with severe TBI. For Russian healthcare facilities, the CREVICE framework can serve as a reference for the development and modernization of local clinical protocols.

1. Potapov AA, Krylov VV, Gavrilov AG, Kravchuk AD, Liсhterman LB, Petrikov SS, et al. Guidelines for the management of severe head injury. Part 1. Neurotrauma system and neuroimaging. Burdenko’s Journal of Neurosurgery. 2015; 79(6): 100-106. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/neiro2015796100-106

2. Usachev Dyu (ed.). Neurosurgery: National guidelines. Volume II. Traumatic brain injury. Moscow: National Medical Research Center for Neurosurgery named after Academician N.N. Burdenko; 2022. (In Russ.).

3. Krylov VV, Talypov AE, Levchenko OV, Grin AA (eds.). Surgery for severe traumatic brain injury. Moscow: ABV-Press; 2019. (In Russ.).

4. Carney N, Totten AM, O’Reilly C, Ullman JS, Hawryluk GW, Bell MJ, et al. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury, fourth edition. Neurosurgery. 2017; 80(1): 6-15. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000001432

5. Potapov AA, Krylov VV, Gavrilov AG, Kravchuk AD, Liсhterman LB, Petrikov SS, et al. Guidelines for the management of severe head injury. Part 1. Intensive care and neuromonitoring. Burdenko’s Journal of Neurosurgery. 2016; 80(1): 98-106. (In Russ.)

6. Krylov VV, Petrikov SS. Neuroresuscitation: A practical guide. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2010. (In Russ.).

7. Chesnut R, Videtta W, Vespa P, Le Roux P; Participants in the International Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference on Multimodality Monitoring. Intracranial pressure monitoring: Fundamental considerations and rationale for monitoring. Neurocrit Care. 2014; 21(Suppl 2): S64-S84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-014-0048-y

8. Association of Neurosurgeons of Russia. Clinical guidelines. Focal brain injury. Moscow; 2022. (In Russ.). URL: https://ruans.org/Text/Guidelines/focal-brain-injury-2022.pdf (Accessed: 05.08.2026).

9. Association of Neurosurgeons of Russia. Clinical guidelines. Traumatic brain injury in children. Moscow; 2022. (In Russ.). URL: https://ruans.org/Text/Guidelines/pediatric-head-injury-2022.pdf (Accessed: 05.08.2026).

10. Dheansa S, Rajwani KM, Pang G, Bench S, Kailaya-Vasan A, Maratos E, et al. Relationship between guideline adherence and outcomes in severe traumatic brain injury. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2023; 105(5): 400-406. https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2022.0031

11. Cnossen MC, Scholten AC, Lingsma HF, Synnot A, Tavender E, Gantner D, et al. Adherence to guidelines in adult patients with traumatic brain injury: A living systematic review. J Neurotrauma. 2021; 38(8): 1072-1085. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2015.4121

12. Savy N, De Cloedt L, Roumeliotis N, Coll G, Sarret C, Emeriaud G. Association between adherence to guidelines and patient outcomes in severe pediatric traumatic brain injury: A scoping review. J Neurotrauma. 2025; 42(19-20): 1663-1670. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2024.0523

13. Volovici V, Steyerberg EW, Cnossen MC, Haitsma IK, Dirven CMF, Maas AIR, et al. Evolution of evidence and guideline recommendations for the medical management of severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2019; 36(22): 3183-3189. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2019.6474

14. Kochanek PM, Tasker RC, Carney N, Totten AM, Adelson PD, Selden NR, et al. Guidelines for the management of pediatric severe traumatic brain injury, third edition: Update of the Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019;20(3S Suppl 1):S1-S82. https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000001735

15. Hawryluk GWJ, Aguilera S, Buki A, Bulger E, Citerio G, Cooper DJ, et al. A management algorithm for patients with intracranial pressure monitoring: The Seattle International Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Consensus Conference (SIBICC). Intensive Care Med. 2019; 45(12): 1783-1794. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05805-9

16. Chesnut RM, Temkin N, Videtta W, Petroni G, Lujan S, Pridgeon J, et al. Consensus-Based Management Protocol (CREVICE Protocol) for the treatment of severe traumatic brain injury based on imaging and clinical examination for use when intracranial pressure monitoring is not employed. J Neurotrauma. 2020; 37(11): 1291-1299. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2017.5599

17. Godoy DA, Rabinstein AA. How to manage traumatic brain injury without invasive monitoring? Curr Opin Crit Care. 2022; 28(2): 111-122. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000000914

18. Chesnut RM, Temkin N, Carney N, Dikmen S, Rondina C, Videtta W, et al.; Global Neurotrauma Research Group. A trial of intracranial-pressure monitoring in traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med. 2012; 367(26): 2471-2481. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1207363

19. Chesnut RM, Temkin N, Dikmen S, Rondina C, Videtta W, Petroni G, et al. Method of managing severe traumatic brain injury in the absence of intracranial pressure monitoring: The Imaging and Clinical Examination Protocol. J Neurotrauma. 2018; 35(1): 54-63. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2016.4472

20. Hendrickson P, Pridgeon J, Temkin NR, Videtta W, Petroni G, Lujan S, et al. Development of a Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Consensus-based treatment protocol conference in Latin America. World Neurosurg. 2018; 110: e952-e957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.11.142

21. Marshall LF, Marshall SB, Klauber MR, Clark MB, Eisenberg HM, Jane JA, et al. A new classification of head injury based on computerized tomography. J Neurosurg. 1991; 75(Suppl 1): S14–S20. https://doi.org/10.3171/sup.1991.75.1s.0s14