Author Guidelines
Original Studies
Articles submitted by authors must demonstrate relevance and originality, contributing to existing knowledge and practice. Research should be based on rigorous scientific methods and detailed analysis of the obtained data, as well as include justification for the chosen topic and its significance for clinical practice or fundamental sciences.
Authors must clearly articulate their objectives and hypotheses, present results in a clear and logical manner, including necessary graphs, tables, and diagrams. A critical literature review is essential to demonstrate the study’s level of preparation and its alignment with current advancements in the field. Additionally, articles must comply with ethical requirements, including adherence to norms regarding work with human and animal subjects, which should also be reflected in the methodology.
Articles containing original research findings (including meta-analyses) must include the following main sections: a structured abstract (no more than 250 words), keywords (up to 5), Introduction, Materials and Methods, Results and Discussion, Authors’ Contributions, Conflict of Interest, Funding, Use of AI, Data Availability, and References (no more than 50 sources).
Systematic Literature Reviews (Review Articles)
Systematic literature reviews must be thoroughly structured and provide an extensive analysis of current research and articles on relevant topics. Authors must clearly define the review’s purpose, highlighting its relevance and significance for future research. Key directions, trends, and controversies in the studied fields should be identified, along with an evaluation of methodological approaches used by different authors.
The review should ensure sufficient depth of analysis, emphasizing both achievements and existing knowledge gaps that require further investigation. It should include recent studies, primarily published within the last few years, to ensure the material is up-to-date and relevant.
Systematic reviews must include an unstructured abstract (no more than 250 words), keywords, and key sections such as Introduction, Discussion, and thematic subsections, with references limited to a maximum of 80 sources. Similar to original research, authors must include sections on "Conflict of Interest," "Funding," "Use of AI," and "Data Availability."
When preparing articles, authors are advised to follow the PRISMA guidelines (https://www.prisma-statement.org/).
Perspective / Opinion Articles
Articles in this category are invited contributions (invited articles) authored by recognized experts in the relevant field (experts are invited by the editorial board and the journal’s editor-in-chief). These articles should present the author’s well-founded opinion on current issues in the field, based on an analysis of contemporary research and clinical practice.
Authors must support their position with relevant scientific data and personal clinical experience, discussing potential implications of their proposals for advancing professional knowledge and improving patient outcomes. Articles should critically analyze existing approaches and methods, discussing their advantages and disadvantages, as well as proposing optimizations for therapeutic strategies or diagnostics.
Authors are expected to consider alternative viewpoints to provide a comprehensive discussion. Clarity and conciseness are key; excessive terminology should be avoided to make the material accessible to a broad audience, including specialists and related professionals. The conclusion may suggest ideas for future research, highlighting open questions in the field.
The organizational principles of the article are similar to those outlined earlier. The reference list is limited to 50 sources.
Case Studies
This category includes scientific articles describing unique or rare clinical cases, demonstrating their significance for understanding specific diseases and treatment methods. Authors must provide a detailed case description, including the patient’s clinical history, diagnostic results, and treatment specifics, illustrating the complexity of decision-making in clinical practice.
The description should be supported by relevant visual materials, such as neuroimaging data, surgical photographs, or graphs, to enhance reader understanding. Articles must also include an analysis of treatment outcomes, discussing both successful and unfavorable aspects, and compare findings with existing literature to identify new trends, concepts, or approaches.
The conclusion should highlight potential clinical takeaways and recommendations for practitioners. Studies must comply with ethical standards and patient rights, including obtaining consent for publishing case-related information.
Articles must include an unstructured abstract (no more than 200 words) and no more than 25 references. Key sections are the same as for other article categories.
Commentary
Articles in the "Commentary" category should provide critical analysis or interpretation of recent publications, research, and trends. Authors must clearly articulate their arguments, supported by available data and contemporary scientific approaches, to broaden understanding and stimulate further discussion.
Commentaries should be structured, including an introduction, main body, and conclusion summarizing key points and recommendations. References to recent scientific articles are essential to validate relevance and allow readers to explore the topic further. An interdisciplinary approach and consideration of diverse expert opinions are encouraged.
The article length should not exceed 1,000 words (no more than 10 references).
Letter to the Editor
Letters should be concise, presenting the author’s perspective on current issues within the field, scientific research, or practical cases. Authors should support their arguments with recent research and literature, citing specific publications where applicable.
Letters may include constructive criticism of previous works published in the journal or discuss new findings of interest to readers. Ethical norms must be observed, avoiding personal attacks or offensive statements. Formatting and style should comply with the journal’s editorial standards, including proper citation and bibliography.
Letters should not exceed 500 words (no more than 5 references).
Additional Guidelines
The Sibneuro journal supports full and transparent reporting of biomedical research and recommends authors follow EQUATOR Network guidelines when preparing articles (https://www.equator-network.org/).
The journal accepts articles in Russian and English. Russian-language submissions must include a full English translation to facilitate peer review by international experts. Authors are advised to ensure high translation quality.
Authors’ Contribution
The corresponding author must specify the contributions of all co-authors in the designated section, using roles from the CRediT taxonomy (https://credit.niso.org/).
Conflict of Interest
Authors must disclose all potential conflicts of interest that may influence the results and interpretation of their work, including financial, personal, professional, or other relationships that could introduce bias. Non-disclosure may lead to article rejection.
Funding
Authors must specify funding sources, ensuring transparency and credibility. Supporting institutions, grants, scholarships, or other financial aid should be detailed.
Use of AI
Generative AI and AI-based tools may only be used to improve readability and language. Human oversight is required, and authors must carefully review and edit AI-generated content. Authors bear full responsibility for the work’s content. This section must detail whether AI was used and for what purposes.
Data Availability
Authors must comprehensively describe how readers and researchers can access the data used in the study. Links to repositories or databases should be provided, along with any access restrictions or licensing terms.
Article Submission Guidelines
ARTICLE SUBMISSION is conducted through the journal’s online editorial system. To submit an article, the following files must be uploaded:
- Manuscript text (in Microsoft Word format);
- Figures (in JPG, PNG, or TIFF format);
- Tables (in Microsoft Word format);
- Supplementary materials (if applicable).
Manuscript Formatting Requirements
- Text layout: 1.5 line spacing with page numbers.
- Font: Times New Roman, size 12.
- Page size and margins: Standard A4 with 2.5 cm margins.
When presenting measurement results obtained in scientific research, International System of Units (SI) must be used.
- Mathematical formulas should be provided in editable text format, not as images.
- Simple formulas should be written inline with regular text.
- For fractional expressions (e.g., *X/Y*), use a forward slash (/), with variables in italics.
- For exponential notation, use "exp" (e.g., exp(x)).
- Equations should be displayed separately from the text and numbered sequentially in the order they appear.
Requirements for Figures and Tables
Figures
- Vector graphics should be saved in EPS or PDF format, with embedded fonts or text converted to outlines.
- Color or grayscale photographs should be saved as TIFF, JPG, or PNG with a minimum resolution of 300 dpi (at least 1063 pixels for single-column width or 2244 pixels for full-page width).
- Line art (raster images) should be saved as TIFF, JPG, or PNG with a resolution of at least 1000 dpi (minimum 3543 pixels for single-column width or 7480 pixels for full-page width).
- Combined line art and halftone images (color or grayscale) should be saved as TIFF, JPG, or PNG with a minimum resolution of 500 dpi (at least 1772 pixels for single-column width or 3740 pixels for full-page width).
Figure captions must include:
- A brief title (not displayed on the figure itself).
- A description of the image.
- Minimal embedded text; all symbols and abbreviations must be defined.
Tables
- Must be provided as editable text, not images.
- Should be placed near the relevant text or on a separate page at the end of the manuscript.
- Must be cited in the text and numbered sequentially.
- Should include a title and footnotes placed directly below the table.
Reference List Requirements
- All cited references must be accurate and complete, including author names, journal/book titles, publication years, and page numbers.
- Unpublished results and personal communications should not be included in the reference list but may be mentioned in the text.
- Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) are strongly encouraged for better accessibility.
- Citation style must be consistent throughout the manuscript.
- In-text citations should be numbered in round or square brackets (e.g., [1] or (1)).
- The reference list at the end of the article should follow the order of citation in the text.
Changes to the Author List
- The journal does not accept changes to authorship after manuscript submission.
- Authors must carefully finalize the author list and order before initial submission.
Supplementary Materials
- Supplementary files (appendices, images, videos, audio) are encouraged to enhance publication quality.
- All supplementary materials must be cited in the text.
- Each supplementary file should include a brief descriptive caption explaining its content.
- If updates are needed during publication, revised files must be provided.
Article Retraction Policy
A publication may be retracted for the following reasons:
- Plagiarism, data falsification, or major errors undermining scientific validity.
- Incorrect authorship, duplicate publication, or republication without consent.
- Undisclosed conflicts of interest or other ethical violations.
- Failure to undergo peer review.
If a retraction is issued:
- The authors will be notified of the reason and retraction date.
- The article remains accessible on the journal’s website but is marked as "Retracted" with the retraction date visible in the text and table of contents.
